Renewable energy output must more than quadruple to replace fossil

A new study from the University of Oregon is challenging conventional thinking on alternative energy someday replacing fossil fuels. The study says it can take as much as 10 units of alternative energy to replace one unit of fossil fuels.

GLOBE-Net. April 3, 2012 - A study from the University of Oregon and published in the journal "Nature Climate Change" is challenging conventional thinking that renewable energy sources may one day replace fossil fuels.

Sociologist Richard York studied the use of electricity from fossil fuels and alternative sources in 130 countries during the past half century. He discovered that rather than replacing fossil fuels, the alternative energy sources barely outpaced rising demand in the past 50 years.

The study concludes that "it can require between four and 10 units of renewable energy from nuclear, hydropower, geothermal, wind, biomass or solar to produce a single unit of fossil fuel-generated electricity."

The assumption of many in the alternative energy and climate change field, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is that each unit of energy supplied by non-fossil fuel sources takes the place of one unit of energy supplied by fossil fuel sources.

York shows that the average pattern across most nations of the world over the past fifty years is one where each unit of total national energy use from non-fossil-fuel sources displaced less than one-quarter of a unit of fossil-fuel energy use. And the study shows that focusing specifically on electricity, each unit of electricity generated by alternative sources displaced less than one-tenth of a unit of fossil-fuel-generated electricity.

York cites the "complexity of economic systems and human behaviour" as the reason. As more alternative energy supply came on-line, energy demand continued to rise. He cites the example of nuclear power.

Thirty to 40 years ago, nuclear power plants were built to provide a clean, cheap renewable electricity source. However, fossil fuel use continued to grow at the same pace. York argues the same may happen as alternative energy technology matures and more systems are brought on-line.

"I'm not saying that, in principle, we can't have displacement with these new technologies, but it is interesting that so far it has not happened," says York.

"One reason the results seem surprising is that we, as societies, tend to see demand as an exogenous thing that generates supply, but supply also generates demand. Generating electricity creates the potential to use that energy, so creating new energy technologies often leads to yet more energy consumption."

York believes that alternative energy sources could someday replace fossil fuels, but it will take decades and a change in political and economic factors. He says alternative energy sources are already replacing fossil fuels, albeit on a very small scale.

The problem is there has not been widespread deployment of alternative energy sources. Wind and solar only constitute less than four percent of total electricity production worldwide.

The study indicates that if the same pattern of energy use continues for the next few decades, it will require a massive investment and implementation of alternative energy sources to have any significant impact on fossil fuel use.

York also argues that simply building and installing more alternative energy sources is not the answer. He says society needs to be actively engaged in reducing their fossil fuel use.

"These results challenge conventional thinking in that they indicate that suppressing the use of fossil fuel will require changes other than simply technical ones such as expanding non-fossil-fuel energy production," said York.

This issue was recently addressed in the "West Coast Clean Economy" report prepared by GLOBE Advisors and the Center for Climate Strategies. "Full costing of carbon is an essential element in strengthening the clean economy," while "...distortions of the energy marketplace that have artificially lowered the true costs of fossil fuels serve as disincentives to the deployment of renewable and clean energy technologies."

The report also states that clean energy does have the ability to reshape global energy market, but "current energy costing structures often do not take into account the high costs of negative externalities such as GHG emissions, air and water pollution, and ecosystem destruction." This distorts the energy marketplace and creates a disparity between clean and conventional energy sources.

Featured Product

GreenFasten™ solar panel roof mount hardware, watertight, USA made

GreenFasten™ solar panel roof mount hardware, watertight, USA made

The GreenFasten™ - GF1 system utilizes the patented watertight technology EcoFasten Solar® is known for. The flashing is fit with our EPDM rubber bushing and when used with a compatible EcoFasten Solar compression bracket (milled with countersink), a watertight seal is created, which protects the integrity of the roof. Requiring just a single fastener (lag bolt or self-drilling), GreenFasten provides the fastest install in the industry and will not void roofing manufacturer's warranties. Backed by IAPMO certification, GreenFasten delivers a mounting solution for all new or existing (retrofit) composition shingle roofs, and is the most cost-effective solution available. Like all of the solar roof mount solutions in our line of products, GreenFasten is made in the USA using recycled materials.